For the application portfolio manager
Applications, components, interfaces, contracts and controls in one model, so tolerate, invest, migrate or eliminate is a decision on the record with the evidence beside it.
In one sentence
AlignX gives the application portfolio manager every application with its cost, risk, lifecycle and business value in one view, ready for a rationalisation decision that can be defended.
Written forApplication Portfolio ManagerDigital Strategy Director
The challenge
If any of these takes a week to answer, the rest of this page is for you.
The solution
TIME matrix
Twenty-four applications placed on functional against technical fit. Banner Student Legacy and Legacy Print Manager sit in the unreasonable corner; Azure DevOps and Canvas LMS in the healthy one.

Technical fit
Hosting, single sign-on state and provider next to the fit, so the rationalisation case reads off the register.

Contracts and providers
Alma Library Platform Subscription, Allocate+ Timetabling Licence, Adobe Enterprise Term Licence. The contract register, by provider and category.

Day to day
The AlignX technology
Questions
AlignX replaces standalone APM tools (LeanIX APM and similar), consolidates the APM and EA disciplines into one platform, and integrates with your CMDB (ServiceNow and Jira Service Management) for CI-level data. You get application, capability, risk, cost and lifecycle context in one place, drawing from the systems that already own the raw data.
For most organisations, yes. AlignX handles the full application portfolio lifecycle plus enterprise architecture in one platform. Standalone APM and EA tool licences (typically 80k to 400k AUD combined) come out of the estate. Consolidation usually funds the AlignX platform on its own.
Every application gets a record with owner, business criticality, cost, risk and lifecycle stage, sourced from CMDB, SSO logs and finance data. Where ownership is unclear, AlignX flags it and runs a discovery workflow to nominate an owner. Orphans stop being invisible.
Yes, both natively. You can also run custom assessment frameworks. Assessments produce a portfolio disposition view that feeds directly into investment decisions and the delivery portfolio, so a \"Migrate\" decision becomes an actual project, not a sticky note.
Cost from finance, risk from your risk register, business value from the capabilities each app supports, all on the same record. You can view the portfolio by any of them, or by combinations (high cost, low value, high risk). This is the view that gets rationalisation decisions made.
Every app has a lifecycle state (invest, tolerate, migrate, eliminate, retire) with target dates, owner, dependencies and business case. Transitions are governed. Retirement is planned, tracked and evidenced, so you can actually prove the sunset happened.
A \"Retire this app\" disposition creates or links to the delivery initiative, with owner, budget and target date. The application record shows retirement progress live. You stop discovering \"we still pay for that\" three years after the decision.
Ten minutes, twenty-one questions, an instant maturity score.