Use Case

GRC Modernisation

Connect governance, risk and compliance to the decisions they are meant to govern. AlignX holds GRC as a connected dimension of the enterprise model, governed by Microsoft Entra and protected by Microsoft Purview, with compliance obligations mapped to Purview's framework catalogue, including PSPF, ISM, ISO 27001 and NIST.

The decision problem

Why GRC modernisation falls short

GRC modernisation programmes often produce better GRC tools: better risk registers, better compliance platforms, better audit workflows. What they rarely produce is a better connection between GRC and the strategic, investment and architectural decisions that GRC is meant to govern. The result is more sophisticated compliance documentation, but governance that remains structurally reactive and disconnected from the decisions that create risk.

Better GRC tools without better decision connection is optimisation of the wrong layer.

How AlignX helps

Decision enablers

01

Connect risk to architectural decisions

Connect risk conditions to the architectural and investment decisions that create or mitigate them, making risk a live dimension of the decision model, not a periodic catalogue.

High Risk
Vendor single-point-of-failure
Architectural Decisions
Cloud-first infrastructure mandate
Architecture Board
Single-vendor Azure commitment
CIO
Affected Applications
Student PortalLMSHR SystemFinance Portal
Outcomes

What good looks like

GRC disconnected from the decisions it governs

GRC is connected to the decisions it governs, not separated from them.

Compliance evidence assembled from disparate documentation

Compliance evidence is generated through the decision model, not assembled from disparate documentation.

Governance bodies making decisions without full context

Governance bodies make better decisions because they have full decision context.

See what connected decision intelligence looks like